Category Archives: ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


“Why did the chicken cross the road?“ I was holding it by the neck. Its mangled body was oozing giblets and intestines, hanging down and swinging like bloody pendulums. But time had run out for this young chicken, my prize Rhode Island Red, Betty. She had attempted to cross the road. She was run over by a 15-wheeler carrying a load of potatoes from Boise, Idaho to Chicago, Illinois. He didn’t even stop after flattening Betty, making her look like a Hippy wall hanging alongside the white line.

How did this happen? Why did this happen?

Betty has just laid her second egg before she took off across the road. Maybe she felt lighter and faster and just wanted to run. I was settling in on that answer when I saw Cockadoodle, the neighbor’s rooster, strutting up and down the road shoulder, flapping his wings, and crowing.

There it was: Cockadoodle had lured Betty to her death. She was an innocent young hen. She was not wise to the ways of the barnyard. Cockadoodle knew this and killed her. Does Cockadoodle deserve to die? Yes! Most certainly!

I went home and got my flamethrower that I use to burn weeds. Today I would use it to burn a rooster. I brought my dog Thyme to catch Cockadoodle and deliver him to my feet. Everything went well, up until Thyme delivered Cockadoodle to my feet. Cockadoodle ran away. Thyme caught him, and we went through the running away and catching several times, until finally, Thyme bit down hard and killed Cockadoodle. I put the dead rooster in the road where Betty was killed and lit hm on fire.

This is called “Justice.” Right?


Definitions courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu).

Daily Trope is available in an early edition on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


There is a reason for everything. Think about it. What does it mean to say “This had to have happened for a reason”? This is often said when everybody is mystified about why something happened, as if saying “it must have happened for a reason” absolves people from looking for the reason. But, when they realize it did actually happen for a reason, they want to know what the reason is. They know they can’t do it alone. That’s when they turn to me “Cam” (short for “Camshaft”) Vontell, Private Detective: “The Truth Hunter.”

I make it clear to my clients that I have magical powers, and no matter how far-fetched it may seem to be, the results of my detecting are unerring. I suffered from acute paranoia for five years, living among a group of paranoid men at “Beaver Tail State Sanatorium” in Beavertail, Montana. We spent our days searching for truth behind everything, concealed in the invisible reasons behind everything—reasons that our Overlords cleverly and secretly had for everything that made reality tick without our awareness. When we came to the powerful insight that our awareness was unaware, we started speculating further, to retrieve our freedom and put us back in control of the secret forces propelling us through life.

The most paranoid member of our group was Bunny Manson. He invented the “Motive Game.” We would do something, and then avow a motive for doing it. I might say “I tied my shoelaces so my shoes wouldn’t fall off.” The other players would call me a liar and then think of the “real” motive, never believing the avowed motive. A player might say: “Liar! You are a narcissist!” The game prepared us to play the game of life, thinking outside the so-called box, using counter-intuition and irrational speculation to discover the “truth” in the powerful hidden causes and motives that form the foundation for the natural and social orders.

So, there’s a hidden reason for everything: Your mother died of natural causes? Ha! You dupe. She was run over and mangled by a truck. Her body was reconstructed by robot surgeons in a clandestine mortuary located in a cave somewhere in Nevada. She was transported home on a government-owned train, “The Federal Necro-Express.” Clearly, she arrived this morning, dressed for her funeral with that cute little smile on her face. Case closed. When Cam Vontell says “Case closed,” the case is closed, no questions asked. The end.

By the way, I love to say “Case closed.” It works every time to make a client think we’ve discovered the truth. I target clients that are wrapped up in conspiracy theories. They’ll believe anything. I think most of them suffer from non-clinical paranoia, but somehow, they get along, living under the dead fist of the deep state.


Definitions courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu).

The Daily Trope is available on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


Why did I let him do it? Why did I stand by and let it happen? I guess it was because I loved him. I thought it was the right thing to do.

We grew up together. We went through school together. In our senior year we fell in love—deeply in love. We spent all our free time together and we missed each other when we had to be apart. We decided to go to college together. We went to UC Santa Barbara where he majored in electrical engineering and I majored in English Literature. These were divergent interests, but it didn’t matter. We knew he’d make a lot of money and I would do a great job of reading bed time stories to our children. We got married when we graduated and stayed on so he could complete a Master’s Degree. I worked in the library cataloguing books and he had a teaching assistantship. Between us we did ok.

The years passed quickly. He got a job designing electric implements—everything from lawnmowers to cars. I was a devoted housewife and had two babies—Rhonda and Yolonda. They’re in college now. But, when they were five and six, respectively, Cliff came home said he had a surprise—to come outside and see. There was a tattered black velvet recliner with different-sized full moons printed all over it. We had no room for it in the living room. So, with much effort we carried it down into the basement.

Cliff sat in the chair and leaned back. A little foot rest popped up. Cliff said it was incredibly comfortable and closed his eyes. As soon as he closed his eyes he started convulsing and his head flashed red and blue—almost like a strobe. I was terrified. I thought Cliff would die. I didn’t know what to do. Suddenly, Cliff opened his eyes and he was back to normal. “I just witnessed the Battle of Gettysburg! I was there. It was horrendous, but exciting. I’m lucky to be alive!” I believed him. He never lied. “What’s next?” I asked. him. “I don’t know,” he said. Well, Cliff figured it out and decided to keep riding the chair. Cliff’s chair riding went on for years. The chair wouldn’t work for me and we kept our kids away from it.

Unfortunately, the chair chose where Cliff would go, and it wasn’t nice. It was to battle fields throut history. Cliff seemed immortal when he travelled into harm’s way—from the Battle of Marathon to Waterloo. He witnessed hundreds. He developed a taste for war, started wearing camo and bought several firearms. He built a shooting range in the basement and joined the NRA. He bought a set of walkie-talkies and we used them to communicate between us, using military protocols. He called me “Baby 1” and I called him “Big Guy.”

Then, I called hm to dinner one night and he didn’t respond. I went down in the basement and found him laid out in the chair, dead.he had on weird looking boots covered with reddish orange mud. His camo fatigues were torn on one leg and covered with dirt too. His face was covered with camo cream paint.

The Coroner couldn’t determine his cause of death. Analysis of the mud on his boots found that it was likely from Vietnam. I went to the Vietnam war Memorial. I found his name in the directory dated 1968. We got married in1980. I couldn’t stop crying. How did this happen? Why did this happen? I will never know, and if it wasn’t for our two children, I might believe it never happened.

I burned the chair and will remain in mourning for Cliff for the rest of my life.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu)

The Daily Trope is available on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


It was too late to be working on my wood carving. I was so tired I could cut myself with my electric carving tool. I had simply put a carving bit in a dentist’s drill and strapped a piece of wood in the dentist’s chair. I specialized in teak molars. Each one had a silver filling. Each one was about the size of a beer keg. Since the molars were made of wood, I would jokingly ask myself, what would George Washington think? I would answer: “He would love it. He would pick it up and do a jig holding on his head,” and calling Martha to come and see. But this was just a futile fantasy—the tooth weighed around 50 lbs, and George probably couldn’t hoist it up on his head.

My hand-carved giant wooden teeth were not selling well, in fact, they weren’t selling at all. That’s why I worked on my craft at night—I had a day job at “Doom Box.” We made “affordable” bomb shelters. We repurposed porta-potties, installing steel doors, burying them vertically, and fitting them with a solar powered ventilation system. You have the convenience of the sit-down toilet and a urination pipe. There’s wall-to wall carpeting, a solar powered space heater, lighting, little refrigerator, geiger counter, and a well. There’s a remote controlled machine gun mounted in the dirt above the shelter to “fend off” unruly neighbors. It has solar powered cctv so it is always “looking” everywhere. The shelters can be joined together to accommodate a family, each module containing the same amenities. There are more features, but suffice it to say to say the shelter will give you a smooth ride through the end of time! The END will be a beginning in the comfort of your radioactive resistant underground hutch: like Nero, doing a jig while the earth burns. You could play a harmonica Wouldn’t it be funny if that was how the “Armageddon Rider” was advertised? Well, it isn’t. But I don’t care. It’s a job.

I’ve been wracking my brain trying to think of what I might be able to make with my dental carver that may be more salable. I thought of teak clothespins. But there’s not much of a market there—most people use a clothes dryer. Then, I thought of teak letter openers. But, given email there’s not much of a market there. THEN! I got the idea I could carve statues of people’s pets! They would be life-sized and cost $800-$1050. My first commission was a pet beaver. The client laughed and told me it was his wife’s beaver. I didn’t laugh, taking the moral high road. He said: “What’s the matter, don’t you like my wife’s beaver?” So, I laughed. He said, “What’s so funny about my wife’s beaver you pervert?” He picked up one of my chisels. He lunged at me. I stepped aside and he landed on his face in the dental chair. My carving tool was fitted with an auger bit. I pressed it to his neck and hit the foot pedal that controlled it’s speed. He said “Bastard” and gurgled and died.

What happened was judged to be self defense. My “victim” had recently escaped from a cult. It was called “The Society of Nocturnal Remission.” They believe that forgiveness comes at night when you are sleeping, so it’s like it never happened. While the hearing was going on, I met my victim’s wife, whose beaver, in a way, had caused her husband’s death. She showed no remorse. “He was a lunatic,” she said. We dated, and I made a statue of her beaver and surprised her with it. She was joyous and asked me to move in with her. Actually, she moved in with me. I couldn’t move my studio—the dental chair alone weighed a half-ton.

So we settled in. One day she told me her sister was coming to visit and she was bringing her beaver so it could play with my wife’s beaver. That’s when I decided to take my wife’s beaver out to the swamp and turn it loose, where it would be free to eat logs and build dams. It was cruel, but all the beaver talk was driving me mad. So, I decided to get her a cat from the animal shelter. She didn’t mind getting rid of the beaver—she said it smelled and weighed 70 lbs and wasn’t fun any more. When she first saw the cat she said, “Oh, it’s my pretty little pussy.” I asked myself, “Why didn’t I get her a Parakeet? Because I love cats. So, what to do?” I decided to give the cat a name, and call it only by its name. We had him neutered and decided to name him Nonuts; and call him Nuts for short. We only call him Nonuts when he’s bad.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu)

The Daily Trope is available on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


If there is no solution to a problem, does that mean it’s not a problem? If it isn’t a problem, what is it? A fact of life? Some people devote their lives to developing solutions to non-existent problems. Like Lord Edward Pordle, the little-known 19th Century idiot who was highly regarded in his own time as a praiseworthy devotee of philosophic inquiry, which had a much wider scope and much less professional tenor than it has today. Philosophy was a rich man’s game, one of the first things to be called a “hobby” by the elite. One of its primary purposes was to demonstrate that the rich and the royal were not dull-headed layabouts; devotees of fox hunting, and whoremongering. In a way, philosophy became a front for their continued dissolution. They capitalized on philosophy’s ancient cache to conceal their worthless and immoral pursuits claiming whoring and horse riding were both philosophic endeavors. This was the problem Lord Pordle endeavored to find a solution to all of his life: Are whoring and horse riding philosophic?


His first contribution was to declare that everything is philosophy—not just theories of knowledge and reality and concepts of the true, the good, and the beautiful. At around that time rubber was discovered and it provided Lord Pordle with a brilliant metaphor (or maybe simile): for philosophy: “Philosophy is reality’s rubber suit. Even if there’s nothing there it shows a telltale contour, projecting the essence of what lies beneath.” To prove his point, he presented a whore dressed in rubber. Her contours were plain. Thus, she could be claimed as a site of philosophy for the development of theories of knowledge and reality and concepts of the true, the good and the beautiful. London’s “Guild of Practical Pimps” gave Lord Pordle an award of 500 pounds, and the newly invented rubber penis sheath was given his name: “The Pordle.”The sheath’s German inventor, Wilhelm Willy, claimed he got the idea from reading Pordle’s rubber theorem pamphlet and it’s explanation of rubber’s ability to act as a vessel and a shield, leading to further rumination on the inside and the outside as merely different perspectives, not actual places. It was quite a moment in merry London Towne. Then, Darwin came along and Pordle’s world came crashing down. Nobody, to this day, knows why. Clearly, Lord Pordle could’ve adapted his rubber theorem to evolution—looking at evolution as a stretching rather than an origin.

As he was wont to do when his ideas were roundly challenged, Lord Pordle cried, using the words “boo hoo” over and over as his vehicle of sorrowful expression. He was able to stop when his “Soothing Maid” was summoned. She placed him on her lap and petted his head like a puppy, giving him a chocolate bar from Holland. When he finished his chocolate bar he was restored, got off his Soothing Maid’s lap, and went back to his philosophic endeavors.

The next day he became a follower of the romantics. He believed in the primacy of the emotions. He had “I feel in order to think” tattooed on the back of his neck. Neck tattoos became all the rage throughout Europe and a large number of previously unemployed poets were hired by their nations’ tattoo parlors to assist their clients in finding the right words. Lord Pordle was doing great. In Europe, he was known as “Lord Tattoo.” However, he was 97 years old. He was way beyond the life expectancy of a 19th century man. He died in his study working on a treatise on the “importance and glory” of the recently invented shoelace titled “Whither Will the Buckle and the Button Tend?” He also had a little known interest in optics. He had been detained several times during his nighttime surveillance activities on the grounds of the local convent. He had said that he had “seen more than any man should see.” His “Peer at the Realm” spyglass was under development in his modest workshop, only to be purloined on the night of his death by one of Jeremy Bentham’s thugs who used it as the basis for his prisoner observation scheme.

Lord Pordle was an idiot, but he was born into immeasurable wealth. He was buried in Highgate Cemetery in a rubber suit.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. There is also a Kindle edition available.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


What is the BIG QUESTION that everybody wants the answer to, that will enable them to obtain whatever answers to the BIG QUESTION that they need to find whatever the answer answers? If you don’t know the BIG QUESTION, you’ll never find the answer. How can you find an answer without the question it answers? You don’t even know if it is an answer—maybe it’s a question that is improperly punctuated, with the question mark missing. This possibility opens a strategy for mining declarative sentences, by making them into questions. You read: “He huffed and he puffed and he blew the house down.” By reframing this statement into a question, you can start to give answers that may yield an abundance of answers, ranging from the full lung capacity and blow power of a wolf, to the place of ‘the threat’ in children’s stories and in life in general. Going down this path, you remember the numerous times you’ve been threatened, and the threats’ consequences. As you go further, you may speculate on the relative efficacy of fear vs. objective ratiocination as an inducement to cooperate, or as a simple act of cruelty as a precursor to a gruesome death as in the case of the Big Bad Wolf’s quest to whack the pigs.

Is there a single BIG QUESTION, or are there multiple BIG QUESTIONS? But again, is there a BIGGEST QUESTION? Some people jokingly refer to the question: “How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?” They say “A woodchuck can’t chuck wood, so shut up loser.” Well, maybe that’s the case with woodchucks, but what about hands? What about this question: “What is the sound of one hand clapping?” Like the wood chuck’s in inability to chuck, one hand can’t clap. Only an idiot would try to answer this question, right? But people have been trying to answer this question forever, sitting in an orange robe on a stone floor somewhere in Japan or California. And what about the woodchuck? If we pay close attention to the question, it hinges on the hypothetical “if he could” which deflects speculation away from the woodchuck’s literal anatomy to his character attributes. How would he fare against a beaver or a muskrat? What do we learn about the woodchuck, and life in general, by understanding the woodchuck question as providing a launchpad for philosophical debate and discussion? The same is the case for “one hand clapping.” It can be rejected as complete nonsense, or used as a platform for performing deeper speculation and personal growth by torturing yourself in a monastery, and most likely, cheating by making up a noise and claiming you heard it when you were clapping with one hand. The head monk will laugh at your duplicity and have you thrown out of a second story window. Given your now broken wrist, you can clap with one hand by slapping your forearm with your dangling hand. But that’s not good enough for the head monk. You yell “Fuck this place,” And the Head Monk nods his head. You got it!

So what BIG QUESTION have you answered, or attempted to answer, in your life? Like Foreigner, “I want to know what love is.” I’ve read 100s of books on the topic. Lots of women have professed their love for me. My answer to the love question has run the gamut from vicious, jealous, possessiveness, to not caring as the best way of caring. Now, I am at a place in my latter time, in the twilight of life, aged, full of history, conscious of the brevity of 80 years. Ironically, for me love is anticipation; of always looking forward to spending time with my wife and daughter. As I speculate on the inevitability of death, I know the wonder of life, and being alive, I am joyous.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. There is also a Kindle edition available.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatiois closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


When I was 10: Can I become a millionaire? Yes! This is America—anything’s possible.

When I was 20: Can I become a millionaire? It’s possible! Finish college and move on up.

When I was 30: Can I become a millionaire? There’s a chance. Manage my investments and take risks.

When I was 40: Can I become a millionaire? Fat chance. I lost everything in the stock market and got laid off. There’s still an outside chance to make a million, but it’s not going to be pretty.

When I was 50: I am a millionaire. I’m living in Costa Rica. I barely escaped the US—I walked across the Tijuana border crossing, took a bus to Mexico City, and flew to Costa Rica. Here in Costa Rica, I “collect” ancient artifacts. I do a service to collectors by displaying them on the dark web. Actually I am a multimillionaire, but I’m stuck in Costa Rica.

When I was 60: When will I be paroled? I just wanted to visit my dying father. Bam: handcuffed at the luggage carousel at LAX. Trial. Conviction. Prison. 10 years. Parole possible in 5 years, and my father’s still alive. Damn.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. There is also a Kindle edition available.

Ratiocination

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatio is closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]


I am the best person for the job. Why? I am a liar. I am loyal. I have a violent streak. I am a racist. But most important, I have been a Conervative all my life.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. There is also a Kindle edition available.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatio is closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]

Should he be impeached? Yes. Why? Clearly, given the pile of evidence, he committed an offense that is impeachable. But, some would say that’s not a good reason to impeach him–he behaves this way “all the time.”  If that’s the case, he should’ve been impeached already! In fact, it is bizarre to claim that frequently breaking the law makes the latest infraction permissible. Where does this idea come from? It comes from the minds of immature idiots whose only criterion of guilt or innocence is loyalty to the accused–regardless of what the accused may guilty of. It nearly makes me sick to know you fools are entrusted with voting on the outcome of his trial and that you make up a majority in the Senate. God save us. God save the United States of America.

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. There is also a Kindle edition available.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatio is closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]

“Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

What exactly was Kennedy getting at when he uttered this famous and memorable phrase?

I think he was interested in instilling a desire for national service and a patriotic willingness to put the USA before one’s self.

This is well and good up to a point, but people need a balance of self-interest and patriotism–the individual and the group–autonomy and connectedness. In many respects putting your country before yourself, stultifies the need for individualism and autonomy.

So, I believe the quote should be rephrased: “Ask what your country can do for you and what you can do for your country.” The both/and approach satisfies and balances two conflicted needs and opens a prospect for greater satisfaction.

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatio is closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]

“To be, or not to be?”

Ironically (sardonically, cynically, pitifully, wistfully, blissfully, bashfully, shit in my pants fully) I (and we) already know the answer: we are all going to not be. We are all going to die.

So, if we are all going to “not be” and we know it, and we really want to show it, should we all just clap our hands, take out a life insurance policy, rest easy, and wait not to be?

Is it better to suffer the slings and crutches and bedpans of our withering biceps and sagging boobies, or turn on the gas?

I don’t know.

  • Post your own ratiocinatio on the “Comments” page!

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatio is closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]

In Florida, I have a right to stand my ground. You threaten me, I kill you. Under lex talionis, does that tally up? What would Hammurabi say?

Let’s re-taliate the ‘taliation: What’s the fair price to pay for being perceived as a deadly threat?

I won’t back down vs. I can’t back down. Back to the wall? Fire away! Otherwise, run away. Does that tally up?

I give up.

  • Post your own ratiocinatio on the “Comments” page!

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.

Ratiocinatio

Ratiocinatio (ra’-ti-o-cin-a’-ti-o): Reasoning (typically with oneself) by asking questions. Sometimes equivalent to anthypophora. More specifically, ratiocinatio can mean making statements, then asking the reason (ratio) for such an affirmation, then answering oneself. In this latter sense ratiocinatio is closely related to aetiologia. [As a questioning strategy, it is also related to erotima {the general term for a rhetorical question}.]

We must buy a more fuel efficient car–maybe a hybrid. Why? Gasoline prices are are rising every week. I’m paying nearly $500 per month just to drive to and from work. Even if fuel prices go down, we’ll still be ahead of the game. No matter what, saving fuel is a good thing.

  • Post your own ratiocinatio on the “Comments” page!

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.