Category Archives: expeditio

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).



Was it a bird? A plane? A speeding locomotive? Was it my neighbor Ed running wild in his back yard wearing a spa towel?

It wasn’t a bird. It had no feathers and was firmly on the ground. It wasn’t a plane. It was firmly on the ground too and it had no propellers or jet engines. Speeding locomotive? Where the hell did I get that idea from? My thinking was scaring me, but I knew it came from my boyhood obsession with Superman—the caped crusader for truth, justice and the American way. Whenever I was unsure of what I was observing, I laid out the bird, plane, and speeding locomotive options. They brought me comfort, relaxing my mind and making it more likely I would draw a seemingly well-considered conclusion, even if it was wrong or insane, or worse.

In the case above, it was in fact Ed running wild in his back yard in his spa towel. He says the towel reminds him of his Scottish heritage—it’s like a kilt with an elastic waistband and Velcro closeure without any plaid. He got a number of different colors and wears them everywhere, even in the winter. It snows a lot where we live and he looks really crazy on snowshoes wearing a baby-blue spa towel trudging through the snow. I don’t know where his spa towel fetish comes from—definitely not his Scottish heritage—he’s of Italian lineage.

I think it started with him flashing the cleaning ladies when he was sitting by his swimming pool. He’d face his house with the towel on and spread his legs and jiggle his junk. The cleaners would stop their work to watch out the back window. Their supervisor admonished him and banned the spa towel. This really irked Ed, but he went along with the ban. Now, he wears the towel grocery shopping and has developed a technique that makes it looks like it got caught on the shopping cart and falls off on the floor. It works like a charm and he’s never been arrested for exposing himself. He’s working on a routine now where his dog Butch pulls off the towel when he’s walking him in the park. In a way Ed reminds me of Superman with his persistence and strength of character. It’s not good character, but it’s strong character.

Uh oh. There’s something coming up my driveway. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Is it a speeding locomotive? Or is it a Jehovah’s Witness? It wasn’t a bird. It had no feathers and was firmly on the ground. It wasn’t a plane. It was firmly on the ground too and it had no propellers or jet engines. Speeding locomotive? Where the hell did I get that idea from? It had to be a Jehovah’s Witness! The door bell rang. I hid in the basement and cleaned off my workbench, hoping he would go away. I went upstairs after about 10 minutes. There was pounding on my door. A voice said “I can see you.” Maybe it was Superman posing as a man of Christ, looking through my door with his X-ray vision. No. No way! Not Superman!

I called 911 and waited for the police to arrive.


Definitions courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu).

The Daily Trope is available on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).


My drawer was empty! All my underpants were gone, Why? Who would benefit from ownership of five frayed and grey pairs of underpants graced with indelible skid marks—something left over from childhood that I just couldn’t shake. My mother tried to teach me how to wipe more effectively. But, I just couldn’t learn. My mother gave up when it became inappropriate for her to fool around down there.

Anyway, I had noticed my char woman eyeing my underpants drawer, and had found my underpants rumpled up on occasion. As sick as it sounds, I have caught my sister Nell with her face burrowed in my underpants drawer. She went “Mmmm” as she moved her face around. Then there’s the butler, Pimpalong. I caught him wearing a pair of my skid-marked underpants on his head, singing “Silly Hat” from Barney the Purple Dinosaur Show. These three people were my primary suspects. Clearly, they all had a fascination with my underpants. I counted out the char woman. She had no place to hide stolen underpants. All she had was the cardboard box she had been given to keep her “stuff” in. I looked in the box. No underpants. She was cleared.

Next was my perverted sister. She was my prime suspect. So, I would question the butler first. On the night of the robbery, he was at the “Roman Nose Pub” until closing with his friends, who corroborated his story. Then, he took the Vicar’s wife home with him to spend the night drinking sherry and reading their favorite novels. The Vicar’s wife corroborated his story. So now, it was time to question my pervert sister.

I asked: “Did you steal my underpants?” She squirmed around in her chair. I lifted her dress. Nell was wearing all of underpants. Clearly, she was the culprit. I angrily told her to take off my underpants. She complied, taking them off one at a time. When she got to them bottom pair, I noticed they had a fresh skid mark, courtesy of Nell! How creepy. I didn’t know what to do. Nell had caught me with my hand in her underpants drawer the week before. It was perfectly innocent. I was looking for my shoehorn that Nell would borrow and forget to return. I said: “Nell, if you don’t steal my underpants again, I’ll let you stick your face in them in my underpants drawer.” She agreed and kissed me.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu).

The Daily Trope is available on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).


Either it was greed, or avarice, or covetousness, or desire or cheese that could’ve caused Sir Reginald Corntwist to steal the wheels from Master Blinker’s taxi coach. Corntwist is neither greedy, avaricious, nor covetous. He waits his turn to fill his lunch pail with leftovers to take to work at his his sweatshop to eat in front of his desperate malnourished employees. Moreover—he is not avaricious. He is deserving of everything he has, even if he’s taken it from its owner, like Ned Bredlow’s horse. It was standing there outside the tavern. Corntwist needed a ride, so naturally, as royalty, he took it. “Sir” has got to be freighted with emoluments and privileges, or the foundations of our nation would collapse into a pile of anarchy and social chaos. The same goes for covetous. Corntwist holds onto his dream of stealing his neighbor’s wife—to save her from a life of boring drudgery and to ride off in his neighbor’s gilded carriage—to save the carriage from falling into a state of disrepair under his careless hand. This is noble, wise, and commendable!

Ah. Now we come to desire. Sir Corntwist has one desire: magnanimity. Especially toward the peasants whose hovels he burned down. He says: “I had no choice if I was to clear my land. I have set aside a 5×5 foot parcel for each family to build a multi-story hovel with a small footprint with land remaining for a chicken t roam and a small vegetable garden. The head of each family will be given a pair of rubber boots.” Clearly, Corntwist desires what’s good.

Now we come to the culprit: cheese. There was cheese crumbled on the ground where the wagon wheels were stolen. If we can connect the cheese to the criminal, we’ve got our theif. Corntwist is lactose intolerant. Just looking at cheese turns his stomach and gives hm a horrendous rash. So, who took the wagon wheels?

It was me!

My wagon wheel shop “Fine Wheels,” expects prompt payment of bills. Blinker was two months behind. It was within my rights to repossess the wheels. Ah—but the cheese. I don’t know what cheese had to do with any of this. The cheese was cut into cubes with toothpicks inserted. Maybe it was Eduardo the caterer who dropped them on his way to the Sumfit wedding—maybe he was in a hurry and didn’t have time to pick them up.

At any rate. My job here is done. Justice has been meted out in the bright light of truth and exemplary argumentation. If you need wagon wheels, large or small, come see me.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu)

The Daily Trope is available on Amazon in paperback under the title of The Book of Tropes for $9.95. It is also available in Kindle format for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).


Our family of six packed in a Ford station wagon, along with the family dog—a one-eyed beagle named Spot. It’s 1957 and we’re doing 70 in a 45 mph zone on Rte.1 going over the bridge to Maine from Portsmouth, New Hampshire. We had just stopped at the New Hampshire State Liquor Store a few miles back so my dad could stock up on tax-free booze for our vacation in Maine. We had left NJ at 4:00am in a huge thunderstorm. The car had been struck by lightening. Nobody was killed, but it made our hair stand on end. My mother and sisters really looked crazy and I was worried that their hair would never flatten out again. But, being from New Jersey, my mom said they’d just say they were “experimenting” with different teasing techniques, and to “back the F off.” My mother had given me and my dad flat tops right before we left. Now, we didn’t have to the Butch Wax them to keep our hair sticking up straight. I saw that as a benefit of almost being electrocuted.

We stopped at LL Bean’s in Freeport. My two sisters and mother got slippers with pine trees, bears and lobsters printed on them. My father got a pair of red socks that said “AY-YUH” on them. Ah-Yuh is the Maine sate motto. My brother got a stuffed lobster children’s toy. He immediately named it “Leviticus Lobster” after his favorite book of the Old Testament. I weaseled my father into getting me a combination compass, whistle, and match stick holder that you could use if you got lost in the woods. I noticed the match stick holder was perfect for hiding cigarettes. So, I had to have it. We got Spot a bag of deer-flavored doggie treats.

We were getting close to our destination—crossing the rickety old Bath Bridge and turning off at the Wiscasset exit. we were headed to East Boothbay where my family had settled in the 1690s. It was low tide when we got to the “bridge” out of Wiscasset over the Damarscota River. At high tide, the water would wash over the bridge.

Then it happened. The sort of pleasant smell of the clam flats turned into an eye-watering nose-burning stench. Somebody had farted. My father turned around and yelled, “What the hell are you four doing back there?” We rolled down car windows, but the stench lingered. We pulled over and got out of car at Nola’s Clam Shack. We all denied farting. My father lined us up and went down the line trying to determine whether we were telling truth. He was one of those people who couldn’t let a mystery go unsolved. He had a Bible in his hand and we had to swear on it that we didn’t fart. We all swore—that eliminated us. Then, we started walking toward my mother. She looked at him coldly, but she swore on the Bible too. Then, she held the Bible while father swore on it. That eliminated everybody. Then we heard a bark from the back of the station wagon. We ran over to the car and we could see the torn open and empty bag of “Deer-Flavored Treats” on the floor of Spot’s carrier. He was able to rake the treat bag though the bars of his carrier with his paw. Spot looked bloated. When my dad opened the station wagon’s back hatch, a stench rolled out and almost knocked us down. Spot was the mystery farter! We tied Spot to a tree and stayed at the clam shack until it closed at 10:00. We were hoping Spot would be “farted out” by then. But that wasn’t enough for my dad. He tied Spot’s carrier to the station wagon’s rooftop carrier and shoved Spot in. Spot started howling from the roof of the station wagon like a police car siren as we headed down Route 96. He was heralding our annual return to the home land. We all started howling as we pulled into the summer cottage’s driveway.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. A Kindle edition is available for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).


It was night. It was cold. Strange things were happening on the off ramp. Strange things were happening everywhere, and that was strange. My car changed colors. The freeway turned into a shallow creek teeming with state-raised trout, and 100s of people panning for gold up and down the former freeway. The deer and the antelope were playing together on the range outside of town—it was like Noah’s Ark had sailed by on the freeway river, brining the animals together. I expected to see a rabbit and a coyote playing horseshoes. And then, the rising sun inched out of the East with a warning written on it in English. Why only English, when the whole world can see it? The warning said: “Let that be a warning to you.” Perhaps the English-speaking world needed to hear this— to take heed and respond.

In order to respond appropriately in the face of the crumbling world order, we set about determining what “that” is. This? The Three Kings from Orient far? Cheating on your wife? Drinking too much! Linoleum floors? Taking two hits of industrial strength LSD. Let’s take a look at these possibilities and determine whether they’re likely answers to our question: What is that? First, “This?” Definite idiot material—this and that are equally vague and don’t get us anywhere. Second. “Three kings from Orient far.” How could the “Three Kings” warrant a warning? They were nice guys who gave Jesus presents that gave his manger a good smell and gave him some money so he could get a jump start in life, and maybe afford a room at the motel next door to the manger. What’s to worry about that? Third. “Cheating on your wife” Well, easier said than done. A little adultery isn’t going to tear the world apart. Look at Jimmy Carter—he took a wrong turn and the world is still here. So, “no” to adultery. Fourth. “Drinking too much.” You can’t drink too much! I’d like to meet the knucklehead who came up with this. I‘m not even going to waste my time commenting on it. It gets a gigantic no! Fifth. “Linoleum floors” There’s some possibility here. If you wear socks on linoleum, you’re doomed. But, linoleum is pretty much a thing of the past. Why would the sun project a linoleum message to the entire solar system if it only pertained to a tiny minority of people who might slip, fall ant get a concussion? Accordingly, we have to rule this out, although it does have some merit.

So, that leaves LSD. That should be a warning. As the world has gone off the rails right under our noses, it must be the case that our water supply has been spiked with acid. I don’t know about you, but I can hear the cheese in my lunch sandwich singing the “Cheddar Daddy Blues.” Also, my fingers have turned into wriggly red worms. Let that be a warning to you! The only thing to do right now is to play Pink Floyd and sit on the floor. Everything will be back to normal in 12 hours. When we come down from the trip, we need to figure out why we all saw the message on the sun. But in the meantime, as your Mayor, I encourage you to enjoy the music, the hallucinations, and the camaraderie.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. A Kindle edition is available for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).


I was looking at my butt in the mirror feeling angry that I had been given a butt the size of a beer keg. I don’t know who they are, but I feel justified in hating them. I’ve had my butt covered with tattoos to distract from its immensity. There’s a rocket ship blasting up my butt crack—it is green and yellow with a beautiful red and purple flame. What is super special is Elon Musk waving with a big grin out a porthole. The rocket is aimed at my tramp stamp which is an Uber cab. It’s there to remind my dates to find me a way home after we’re done with the evening’s activities. Then, I have a Smiley Face on each cheek. Each one is 3” in diameter and has a laughter chip implanted. If you pat my butt it laughs.

And this is what shocked me: there’s a small fresh tattoo of a pepperoni pizza on my lower left cheek. I had never seen it before and I do not know how it got there. I don’t even like pizza and it throws off my butt’s tattoo symmetry. I don’t think I would’ve commissioned such at thing, but maybe I did. Maybe I just don’t remember getting the tattoo, maybe I was drunk, maybe I was knocked unconscious, maybe I have multiple personalities. Bad memory, drunkenness and unconsciousness are out of the question. I have a photographic memory! I don’t drink. And I had no pain in my head recently from being slugged or fed sedatives. That leaves multiple personalities. I did find the remnants of a pepperoni pizza in the trash. There were also 6 pepperoni sausages under my pillow in my bedroom and 2 packages of mozzarella cheese in the bathroom medicine cabinet. Last, there were 3 packages of pizza dough hidden under a board in the living room. So, what do I do now? I guess I’ll get another pizza tattoo on my lower right cheek. Symmetry is important to me—I need balance on my butt.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. A Kindle edition is available for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).


I am sick of mowing my lawn, but my lawn keeps growing. I was going to play Corn Hole with my daughter yesterday, but we couldn’t find it buried in the grass. So, we decided to play badminton instead, but the long grass slowed us down and we couldn’t get to the birdie in time to hit it. So, we gave up on father daughter play time and went our separate ways. I paid bills. My daughter applied for jobs on the internet. I thought, pretty soon the tall grass will make it hard to get out the front door and we will be living in Hay Fever Hotel.

Something must be done. But what?

1. Burn the grass; 2. Get a herd of goats to eat the grass; 3. Plow up the grass and replace it with gravel; 4. Move to the grassless city; 5. Hire my neighbor Mow to deal with my grass.

Let’s take these proposals one at a time and see if one rises to the top.

1. Burn the grass: no, no, no. My house will be surrounded by flaming grass and will probably catch fire and burn down; 2. Get a heard of goats to eat the grass: no. Goats smell bad, make lots of “baaa” noise, and butt people (looking at a lawsuit here); 3. Plow up the grass and replace it with gravel: no, no. Weeds grow out of gravel and look like hell. Also, vandals can throw fistfuls of gravel at my house, breaking windows and denting its aluminum siding; 4. Move to the grassless city: no. The up side of city living is no yard maintenance. The down side is that it’s the city: honking horns, crime, and way expensive. As a WalMart floor manager, I could never afford it. In fact, I would probably have to quit my job and start all over again, just because of my unruly lawn; 5. Hire my neighbor Mow to deal with my grass: Jackpot! Mow is a professional lawn mower. His nickname is short for his profession and he’s only 100 feet away. He mows his yard every day at 5 pm, even in the rain! His grass is as short as a golf course putting green—weedless too. His mower is what I call a “lawn limo.” It goes 30 miles per hour, steers with levers, has two cup holders, and a glass-pack rumble muffler. However, there’s a major stumbling block to securing Mow’s mowing services. I call it the “Hot Tub Misunderstanding.” Mow calls it “My Neighbor’s Death Wish.” Mow’s been divorced since the incident occurred 3 years ago. He has a hot young girlfriend now and seems a lot happier since he divorced Marge. So, I’m going to risk my life, go next door, and ring his doorbell. It would be cowardly to just text him. Maybe I’ll get to meet Mow’s new babe Melinda and have a beer or two with her. No matter what, I’ve got to get Mow on board or soon it will look like I’m living in a hay field. Which reminds me, I could just get a farmer to mow my yard, bale it up, and drive it away. But given all that hiring Mow has to offer, I’m going to give him (and Melinda) a shot.


Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. A Kindle edition is available for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation), and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. [The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).

Why did we end up with a Coronavirus-gone-wild situation here in the United States?

1. Nobody saw it coming?

2. Democrats diverted attention away from the Coronavirus by constantly criticizing Trump?

or

3. China manufactured and distributed the virus via the goods they are flooding our markets with–shoes, plastic forks and much, much more?

My response to these answers is “No, no, and hell no.” I answer no for two reasons: 1. One and two are untrue; 2. Three is untrue and crazy.

The truth is that Donald Trump has very nearly singlehandedly orchestrated the chaos by denying there was a problem when we could’ve been making progress toward managing it. We lost valuable time due his arrogant, self-interested, monarchical shitlyhood.

It will tear me apart when the pandemic subsides and I have to listen to him gloating over how he saved us all. Many lives could have been saved if he had approached this catastrophe from the outset with an honest appraisal and a compassionate hand. He didn’t.

We all would have been better off if he had self-quaranteened from day one and let people who know what they’re doing handle the mess.

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. A Kindle edition is available for $5.99.

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation[, and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).

Why did you vote for Donald Trump?

1. You thought he could get things done?

2. You thought he was going to make life better for you?

or

3. He is honest and trustworthy?

Three strikes! He has turned out to be none of the above. Just read the papers!

(Oh, that’s right–the truth is fake news.)

Maybe you need to reassess your motives and prepare for the next election! There are actually politicians who exemplify the virtues you are looking for. Look for those politicians! Vote for those politicians. Forget about Trump. He is a big phony.

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text by Gorgias.

Buy a print edition of The Daily Trope! The print edition is entitled The Book of Tropes and is available on Amazon for $9.99. A Kindle edition is available for $5.99.

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation[, and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational pattern of arguments]).

Me: Why are you going to school today?

1. To hang out with friends?

2. To make trouble?

or

3. To learn something?

Number One is a waste of time. Number Two is a total disaster. That leaves number three–learning is school’s purpose!

So, “to learn something” is why you’re going to school today. Right?

You: Yes, Ma.

Me: Good! You’re on your way to fame and fortune!

You: Yes, Ma.

  • Post your own expeditio on the “Comments” page!

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation[, and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational patterns of arguments]).

Me: Why did you get a tattoo of a garage door opener on the right cheek of your butt? Wait, wait, don’t tell me! Knowing you, I think there are three possible reasons: 1. Donny Osmond has one.  I know for a fact that Donny has no tattoos on his butt (check out the YouTube video), so that’s out. 2. Your ‘little friends’ ordered you to do it. You’ve been taking your medication, so that’s out. 3. You acted on random impulse.  Since you’ve spent your life doing things without without considering their consequences (e.g. when you amputated your pinky), I’m going with option 3: random impulse, right?

You: I did what to my butt?

  • Post your own expeditio on the “Comments” page!

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text

Expeditio

Expeditio (ex-pe-di’-ti-o): After enumerating all possibilities by which something could have occurred, the speaker eliminates all but one (=apophasis). Although the Ad Herennium author lists expeditio as a figure, it is more properly considered a method of argument [and pattern of organization] (sometimes known as the “Method of Residues” when employed in refutation[, and “Elimination Order” when employed to organize a speech. The reference to ‘method’ hearkens back to the Ramist connection between organizational patterns of discourses and organizational patterns of arguments]).

Where did you get that beautiful diamond ring? No, don’t tell me–let me guess. Either you bought it, found it, stole it, or somebody gave it to you.  Now, let’s see . . . There’s no way you’d buy something like that for yourself–you’re the cheapest person I know.  If you found it, I know you’d would’ve handed it over to lost and found–at any rate you wouldn’t be showing it off like it’s yours–you’d be telling everybody you found it and you’d be looking for its owner. There’s no way you’d ever steal anything–I’ve known you since we were kids. So, all I can say is: Who gave it to you? What’s up? Wow! Life is good!

  • Post your own expeditio on the “Comments” page!

Definition courtesy of “Silva Rhetoricae” (rhetoric.byu.edu). Bracketed text added by Gorgias.